The second Dutch lesson was
structured differently to our first, which was bound to be slightly different
as we are now coming into class having had some exposure to it.
The lesson started with a recap
of what we had covered in the first lesson. We were asked to individually write
down the Dutch for 5 phrases. All the class were involved in giving the answers
and as a combined effort I think we were able to come up with all the answers! I
felt this was a good exercise to do as it refreshed what was previously
covered, which disappointingly does not happen often with the languages I
study. It was also beneficial to hear the pronunciation again.
We then asked and answered questions
in a way that was new to me. Instead of us working in pairs or the teacher
going round asking people individually, we went round the class each answering
a question that was asked by another student and then asking the person next to
us the same question. We did this with a few different questions and in
different orders.
The
present tense was also covered which was explained by our teacher, but we did
have a practice at conjugating.
I thought the teacher and student
talk times were perfectly balanced for this lesson. The student talk time was
varied too, from all offering suggestions for the initial exercise, then a
round robin question and answer session and then working in groups of 4. I found
it thoroughly enjoyable, all activities varied and I got a lot out of this lesson.
Hi Rebecca,
ReplyDeleteA good post, in which you clearly address the brief, also mentioning the variation in the interaction patterns, which was good. I think you could have commented a bit more on the present tense exercise, where I asked you to come up with the pattern yourself, rather than just giving the rule, but other than that, this was fine. Also good to see you making a link with other ways in which you have been taught.
Good work,
Miranda